Planning your aged care needs

The wave of older Australians will continue to grow over the coming decades. As such, we can no longer afford to ignore the issues around aged care with over 1 million retirees already accessing aged care services in Australia.

Planning ahead can help to demystify aged care and reduce stress levels. With awareness and pre-planning, you can maintain control and choice, have access to the financial resources to pay for care and minimise the stress on you and your family. This article discusses the steps you should consider when planning to move to residential aged care.

Step 1 – Plan ahead

We are often reluctant to think about a potential move into care. This means we fail to plan and ignore the warning signs until a crisis emerges. At this point, the time available to evaluate options is limited and decisions may be rushed. Also, our families may start to argue and conflicts arise.




Start with a family meeting to make shared decisions. Use this meeting to:

·        Discuss options and preferences

·        Explore each person’s concerns

·        Decide who needs to be involved in any planning


Frank and open discussion is the first step to an effective decision-making process.


Ask your adviser to facilitate your family meeting. He/she can provide advice as well as offer an impartial and objective view.




Step 2 – Assessing options

Aged care help can be accessed in your home or in a residential service. To help you decide which option is best, arrange a free assessment by an Aged Care Assessment Team/Service (ACAT/ACAS).

You will need to have ACAT/ACAS approval before you can access a government subsidised home care package or residential care.



You can book an appointment directly with ACAT/ACAS on 1800 200 422. Further information is available at


Step 3 – Searching for services

If residential care is required, think about what criteria is important in deciding where to live. Make a list. This should include location, amenities and your health care needs.

This list will help you develop a shortlist of potential services which you might like to contact or visit. But first check what fees will be asked for accommodation and ongoing services to ensure it is affordable for you.

Once you have selected your preferences you can fill in an application form to add your name to the waiting list. You can put your name on the waiting list for more than one service to increase your chances of finding a place.



You can search for services by

·        Visiting and search by postcode for the list of aged care facilities in your preferred location

·        Searching the internet for ‘aged care placement services’ for advice and help to choose a service and negotiate a place


If you would like to fill in an application form to apply for a place, you can use the generic form which is available from





Step 4 – Understanding the fee structure

Most people are often surprised by the level and range of fees. How much you have to pay may depend on:

  • The service you choose
  • Your assessable assets
  • Your assessable income

Your adviser can help you to understand the fees as the total amount payable can be hard to calculate without good advice.




What you will pay for residential care is divided into contributions towards accommodation, care and additional services:

·        Paying for accommodation – we all need to either find a lump sum of money to buy a home or generate income to rent a home. Residential care is firstly accommodation that needs to be “purchased” (refundable accommodation deposit) or “rented” (daily accommodation payment).

·        Paying for basic living expenses – food, electricity, cleaning and laundry services and nursing assistance is subsidised by the government. Residents are asked to contribute to the cost through a basic daily care fee plus a means-tested fee for those who have a higher capacity to pay.

·        Luxuries and lifestyle – additional items can be purchased on a user pays basis or in bundled packages as additional service fees.


Step 5 – Structuring finances

Accommodation costs are set by market forces with prices published on the MyAgedCare website. But if assets and income can be reduced to low enough levels (to become a low-means client) before the move, the government may subsidise accommodation and regulate how much the resident pays.

In this way, the accommodation cost may be cheaper, but is not always better. Choice and control may be lost. Residents may be faced with accepting a place in whichever service has a low-means place available and could even be a shared room.





A homeowner will generally not qualify as low-means unless their spouse (or other protected person) will continue to live in that home.


If potential residents wish to aim for entry under the low-means rules, there are not many pre-planning strategies to reduce assets. One option may be to enter into a granny flat arrangement to transfer ownership of the home to a child in exchange for a life interest to live in the home.


If this transaction occurs within five years before a move into residential care it could be captured under gifting and deprivation rules (depending on circumstances). Instead of being a solution it could create more problems. Other legal issues also need to be considered to minimise the family problems that could arise.


Your adviser can review your full financial situation and provide advice on how to:

  • Make appropriate decisions
  • Structure assets to pay for accommodation and as well as create sufficient cashflow
  • Minimise fees or maximise Centrelink or Veterans’ Affairs benefits


Step 6 – Estate planning

Anytime your circumstances change it is important to consider the impact this has on your estate plans. This includes when you move into aged care.

You should speak to your solicitor about the ability to review and redraft your will to reflect your wishes.

As dementia is a leading factor behind the need for care services, when the time comes it is likely that the client will need to delegate financial decisions to someone else. This is easier if an enduring power of attorney (and guardianship) is in place. So it is important to have the appropriate powers in place before a person has lost legal capacity as once capacity has been lost, it will be too late to set up the powers and a trip to the Guardianship Tribunal will be needed.


The statistics:

·        On average, one new case of dementia occurs in Australia every 6 minutes

·        30% of people over age 85 have dementia

·        More than 50% of people in subsidised aged care facilities have dementia


Source: Alzheimers’ Australia,

Disclaimer: The information in this article is general and does not take into account your particular circumstances. We recommend specific tax or legal advice be sought before any action is taken and refer to the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before investing in any product


Aged Care Insights Spring 2018


The cost of aged care in retirement

Planning your retirement is likely to be exciting. While it may be less fun to think about the potential for physical and cognitive decline in the later part of retirement – our frailty years – this is an important period to plan for if we want to maintain independence for as long as possible.

The reality is that we are all likely to experience some cognitive decline or lose some of our physical ability as we age. This is a natural process but does not mean we will all develop dementia or lose the ability to live independently.

It does mean however, that at some point we may need to ask for help with our normal activities of daily living. This might be help we access in our own home. Or we might need to move into residential care for a higher level of support.

What should I plan for?

Figures from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare[1] estimate that on average approximately 17-25% of your retirement years could be “frailty years”.


If you expect a potential of 30 years in retirement, on average the frailty years would represent 5-7 years. Planning for this length of time and planning early enough might help you to have the resources to pay for care and prevent leaving the planning until crisis point.


If asked, most of us would prefer to stay in our own homes as we age. Staying at home may be possible if we have lower care needs or we can rely on the support of a capable spouse/family or if we have sufficient financial resources to pay for help at home.

But if our care needs are too high for the people around us to cope, or we don’t have support networks, residential care might be a better option.

In any case, planning the financial aspects of your retirement should also include an estimate of how much you might need to pay for care. This is difficult to calculate because of the unknown factors around health, opportunities and finances.

Historically, the approach to retirement planning has been to decide what income you need and then calculate how much you need to save to generate this income. Most people assume a flat (or declining) level of income which grows with inflation. However, if you consider the cost of care, the pattern is more likely to follow an upwards curve as shown in the graph below.


In your early retirement years, you may spend more on leisure activities. This spending may decline as you age but is likely to be replaced with the costs of care or to pay someone to do the activities you used to do yourself.

What does care cost?

The costs of aged care have been increasing and opportunities expanding. The government is increasingly focused on helping to expand and improve the home care opportunities

Australia has a good system of care compared to many other countries, with safety nets to ensure people with lower financial capabilities can access care. But the ability to choose and the options available may be more limited if relying on the low-means concessions.

How much you will need to pay can be difficult to predict. Currently, it can roughly vary from $100 a week to $6,000 a week depending on the options chosen. This covers the wide-range of opportunities from basic home care packages to full-time nursing care at home.

Access to government subsidies and rules for calculating the fees based on your finances helps to make care affordable, but having adequate savings opens up your choices and your ability to control the level and type of care you receive.

Home care packages Residential care
What you might pay $3,767 – $14,553 per year* $18,308 – $45,273 per year*
What government might pay Up to $50,286 per year Up to $90,794 per year

* Additional service fees may also apply if selected and agreed with the service provider

These figures are current to 19 September 2018 and only cover the cost of care. Regardless of which option you choose you also have the costs of accommodation and other personal expenses.

What should I start thinking about?

While you don’t know what your future holds, with some planning you can help to make your retirement a comfortable one and live it the way you choose.

Some of the things you can start to do include:

  • Ensure you have a safe and secure income in place for life – this might be pension income, lifetime income streams or drawdown strategies from other investments.
  • Include your home as a financial resource available to provide a safe place to live – this might be a physical building but it might also be access to equity to pay for care needs by drawing regular income under an equity release arrangement or renting to generate extra income if you move into residential care or selling to access the sale proceeds for other purposes.
  • Consider the impact you would have on family and friends if relying on them to provide care and how you can help with financial support.

Planning to make sure you have resources available is important. Equally important is to ensure you have an Enduring Power of Attorney in place in case someone else needs to take on the responsibility of making the decisions and paying the bills on your behalf.

How do I get help?

Advisersure specialises in aged care advice and matters to help provide our clients with a full retirement planning service.  Ask us today for how we can help you plan for a secure and comfortable retirement throughout all phases of your retirement – including the frailty years.

Call 03 98368399

Or email us at


Dementia Awareness Month

Did you know that dementia is now the second leading cause of death in Australia, and is the leading cause of death for women? Become involved in Dementia Awareness Month.

Dementia is not just one illness, but rather is described by Dementia Australia as the progressive decline in a person’s functioning that may result in a loss of memory, rationality, social skills or physical functioning. It is a broad term and there are many types of dementia.

Dementia mostly affects people over age 80 but can also be experienced at a younger age. Every three seconds someone in the world develops dementia. In Australia there are around 250 new cases every day, with 30% of Australians over age 85 experiencing dementia.

Caring for someone with advanced signs of dementia can be difficult and the carers need lots of support. In the advanced stages, more specialised care and a move into a residential care service may be needed.

Each year in September, Dementia Australia run Dementia Awareness Month to encourage greater awareness and understanding of dementia. The focus this year is on Small actions Big difference with the key message that we can all take small actions to create big differences for the people impacted by dementia as well as their families and carers.

Contact Dementia Australia to become involved or find out more about the resources available to help people experiencing dementia or the people who are close to them.



Did you know?

Creating a funding plan to cover the increasing costs of care may allow greater independence and control. Plan ahead and consider the costs in your home or residential care.

Quick facts:

  • There are currently around 425,416 Australians living with dementia
  • While three in every 10 people over age 85 have dementia, over 26,000 people have younger onset dementia
  • If dementia were a country, it would be the world’s 18th largest economy
  • In 2018, dementia is estimated to cost Australia more than $15 billion. This is expected to increase to more than $36.8 billion by 2056
  • The total estimated worldwide costs of dementia were US$818 billion in 2015
  • Dementia is now the second leading cause of death in Australia. In 2016, an average of 36 people died per day with dementia identified as the underlying cause of death
  • Dementia is the greatest cause of disability in Australians aged 65 or over
  • Over half of the people in residential care facilities experience dementia.

[1] AIHW 2017 report Life expectancy and disability in Australia: expected years living with and without disability, based on expectancies of a 65-year-old.

The Amazing Royal Commission

I have been astonished by the revelations of the incompetence, arrogance and venality of the boards and senior management of these institutions”

Dear Client Unless you’ve been 4-wheel driving through the red centre, you would be aware that the  Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry has been sitting in Melbourne for the past few weeks and every day it seems new ghastly revelations emerge. If this disturbs and worries you it is understandable. I would like to provide some context for you and, I hope, some reassurance about the industry in general and Advisersure in particular. I will mostly focus on the financial advice sector but I will also make some comment on the banking industry.

The Royal Commission’s brief has seen it examining institutions with regard to breaches and failings that have occurred over recent years. To an extent, many of the cases that have been brought up have been reported previously when they first came to light. That so many horror stories are being given headline treatment at one time can perhaps give the impression of the whole industry being a cesspool of incompetents, cowboys and shonks. This would be a false picture. However, I do not, for one minute want to give the idea that I believe there aren’t a lot of things wrong and hopefully this Commission will finally force politicians and regulators to fix some of these problems.

Over more than 30 years there have been a number of commissions and reviews resulting in regulatory changes and it is clear that critical failings have not been addressed. In my view 3 things should have been implemented 20 years ago and should be implemented now:

  • Firstly all advisers should have been licensed and specific competencies should have been subject to license endorsement; it is ridiculous that an adviser with only basic level competency can advise on Self Managed Super or multimillion dollar investments.
  • Secondly commissions on everything except risk insurance should have been outlawed; this finally occurred in 2013 when FOFA was introduced.
  • Thirdly, there should be a clear separation between owners and promoters of product and firms delivering advice. So called vertical integration is a major problem.

Implementation of these three measures would not have eliminated all the problems we have seen but would have gone a long way to preventing disasters like Gunns and Great Southern, Westpoint and Storm Financial for instance. Well the politicos, undoubtedly heavily influenced by the Big Banks, failed at every step with the results we see today.

With that background in mind let me offer a bit of context to what we are now seeing. There are perhaps 25,000 authorized advisers in Australia; many are decent and honest and caring. Unfortunately over 45% of them are authorized through large institutions such as major banks, industry funds and firms like AMP. This has resulted in a product-sales focus allied to very moderate competency and poor supervision. We have known this for many years; it is now coming as a revelation at the Royal Commission. There are good advisers working in the institutionally owned licenses but unfortunately tens of thousands of clients will have received second rate advice from the majority. And just because an adviser is not aligned to a big institution doesn’t guarantee quality although it may improve the odds.

Now I’d like to say a few words about Advisersure.  Our philosophy is based on the belief that we should deliver the best and most relevant advice that we can to our clients. Achieving that over many years has required us to take a number of steps:

  • Licensing – we have always chosen to work with licensees whose philosophy aligns with ours. We have changed licensees on two occasions when they have become institutionally owned resulting in pressure being brought on us to “sell” product. We are currently licensed through the privately owned MyPlanner Professional; we are largely unconstrained as to the advice we give.
  • Qualifications – our advisers and staff are qualified to advise in the areas our clients need. SMSFs are an important part of our business so I have been a Specialist Adviser (SSA) since the designation was first available. Emmett gives Aged Care advice so he is an Accredited Aged Care Specialist. Both Emmett and I hold the Certified Financial Planner (CFP) qualification.
  • Training – we seem to never stop learning. A major flaw of the vertically integrated model is that advisers live in the licensee’s bubble and are fed only what the licensee sees fit to feed them. We have consciously sought education from the widest and the best sources. We always attend the Portfolio Construction Conference and Summit – widely recognized as the best source of knowledge in the investment world. We always attend the SMSF Conference and also seminars run by Grant Abbott and other leading SMSF and Estate Planning Specialists. This takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money but we believe it is essential if we are to serve you effectively.
  • Transparency – we decided to switch to a fee-only model 20 years ago and we receive no commissions or kickbacks from any product we recommend except risk insurance and that’s only because the products do not lend themselves to commission rebating. We also decided years ago to stop using administration platforms as they serve their promoters and advisers well but they are just a cost to clients.
  • Network – we know we can’t know everything so over the years we have built connections with a network of experts in tax, superannuation and law as well as many other niche areas that affect our clients’ lives.

Finally I’d like to offer some comment on the major banks and AMP. Perhaps I am naïve but while I never expected the big institutions to act in their clients’ best interests I admit I have been astonished by the revelations of the incompetence, arrogance and venality of the boards and senior management of these institutions. They deserve everything they will get and probably more.

So where to from here? There will be still more revelations and upheaval. Hopefully, at the end of the day, we will have a better structured industry but perhaps I can be forgiven for some doubt that this will happen. What is good is that the spotlight of public and shareholder opinion is shining fiercely of the management of these organizations and the regulators are stepping up and taking action. Let’s hope the pollies actually get it right for once.

At Advisersure we will continue to do the best we can for our clients; if you have any questions or comments please call me.


Special Offer

We too are disturbed by what has been reported and we know there are people who are very concerned about their position. If you have friends or relatives who are worried about the advice they have received we would like to offer them a free health check on the advice they have received.



2018: A balancing act

Fidelity’s Investment Director, Tom Stevenson, shares his thoughts on investing in 2018.

Most of the time investors don’t need to think too much about market timing or asset allocation. The long-term trajectory of financial markets is up and the only sensible thing to do is to be fully invested and allow the odds to work in your favour. As we enter 2018, however, it doesn’t feel like ‘most of the time’. Nine years into the current equity bull market and with well-known and successful investors like Jeremy Grantham and Neil Woodford muttering darkly about investment ‘bubbles’, every investor’s New Year Resolution should be to look at their portfolio and understand the risks they are taking.

If you try to call the top of the equity market, one of three things will happen. You will get it just right, be too early or too late. The chance of the first is vanishingly small, so it is prudent to assume that if you try and time the market peak you will get it wrong. The only question that matters is how you want to be wrong. Do you care more about losing what you have accumulated in recent years or watching from the side-lines as others make profits that you have consciously foregone?

Whichever misjudgement you choose, it will probably be expensive especially if you are over-exposed to the equity market as most investors are. A year ago, you could have looked at the valuation of the US stock market and concluded that it was over-priced. Shares cost about 25pc more as a multiple of profits than their long-term average. If you had de-risked your equity portfolio at the beginning of 2017, you would have missed out on a 20pc rise in the S&P 500 and even more on the basis of the Dow Jones Industrials index or the Nasdaq.

Anyone bailing out of the market today risks a similar opportunity loss. In every market peak since the 1920s, returns have tended to accelerate in the six months before the market changes direction. On average, missing out on the final year of a bull market has meant leaving 20pc of gains on the table for someone else.

Being late is just as painful. Between 2000 and 2002, the same US benchmark index fell by nearly 50pc. Between the peak in 2007 and the bottom of the market in 2009, the fall was closer to 60pc. These are the exception not the rule but there are plenty of other examples of market falls of between 10pc and 20pc. Even these are worth avoiding if you can. Remember, a 50pc fall in the value of a portfolio requires a 100pc recovery simply to get back to square one.

So if like most people you feel the pain of a loss more than you enjoy the pleasure of a gain, you are probably thinking about protecting what you’ve got. How might you do that?

If you are really risk-averse, you may decide that the market has been driven by excessively loose central bank policy which is now reversing, that valuations have gone too far and that the market has had a fantastic run. You will swap all your investments for cash. Anyone doing this needs to understand that it comes with a significant cost. It’s not just the opportunity cost, it’s the fact that assets like cash with the lowest risks also guarantee the lowest returns. All the while that you are ‘de-risked’ you will be losing money in real terms.

The good news is that you don’t need to do this. If you are prepared to accept that a portion of your portfolio will indeed go ‘over the cliff’ when the market inevitably turns you can still minimise your losses and maintain some exposure to any final ‘melt-up’ phase in the market by injecting some balance into your investments.

To see how this worked the last time an equity market bubble burst, let’s jump back in time to the 1999-2003 boom and bust. In 1999, emerging market equities delivered a total return of 72pc while Japanese shares returned 67pc. A well-diversified global equity fund would have given you 31pc while the defensive assets in your balanced portfolio would have looked drearily pedestrian at 6pc for cash, 3pc for corporate bonds and a modest fall in the value of any government bonds you held.

The following year as the equity bubble burst, the emerging market equities that topped the table in 1999 were the worst performers, losing more than 25pc of their value and the Japanese shares were not far behind. Offsetting those falls, however, were cash, with a slightly higher return than the previous year and double digit returns from all types of debt: emerging market, corporate and government. In 2001, it was the same story. By 2003, however, the tables had turned with emerging market equities the top performer and government bonds at the bottom of the list.

One of the problems with how we think about our investments is that we are encouraged by the media to think it is all about equities. This is natural. Shares are more newsworthy because they bounce around more than bonds and are more closely linked to the ups and downs of corporate news. But this focus on shares encourages us to think in black and white terms about the market. If your New Year’s Resolution is to take some risk off the table, don’t overdo it and don’t swap one unbalanced portfolio full of equities for another stuffed full of cash. At this uncertain point in the cycle you can’t be too diversified.


Written by Tom Stevenson, Investment Director, Fidelity Australia.

Reproduced with permission of Fidelity Australia. This article was originally published at

This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information. You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity Australia’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Reference to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise.
© 2018. FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited.

This provides general information and hasn’t taken your circumstances into account. It’s important to consider your particular circumstances before deciding what’s right for you. Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee take any responsibility for any action or any service provided by the author.

Any links have been provided with permission for information purposes only and will take you to external websites, which are not connected to our company in any way. Note: Our company does not endorse and is not responsible for the accuracy of the contents/information contained within the linked site(s) accessible from this page.

Beyond share prices

Investors shouldn’t overlook that there are two components to sharemarket returns – dividend yield and capital gains (or losses).

Few investors would have missed the news reports of late pointing out that although Australia’s sharemarket has broken through the 6000-point mark, it’s still below the record pre-GFC high. 

But looking at share price movements alone can give investors a misleading impression and encourage them to overreact to short-term market shifts and other market “noise”.

And by excessively focussing on asset price movements, investors may overlook the rewards from compounding total returns (as returns are earned on past returns) and from taking a strategic, long-term approach to investing.

Once reinvested dividends are taken into account, the performance of the Australian sharemarket in the GFC aftermath looks much better – particularly considering the benefits of dividend franking.

On 1 November, 2007, the S&P/ASX200 (prices only) closed at 6828.7 points, its pre-GFC closing high. And on 6 March, 2009, this index closed at 3145.5, its lowest close in the depths of the GFC.

By contrast on 1 November, 2007, the S&P/ASX200 accumulation index (share price plus reinvested dividends) closed at 43,094.3, its pre-GFC high. And on 6 March, 2009, this index fell to 21,298.1, its lowest point in the depths of the GFC.

Now move forward to the beginning of 2018.

On 2 January, 2018, the S&P/ASX200 Index (prices only) opened at 6065.1 points. This was still below its pre-GFC closing high yet 93 per cent above its GFC closing low.

And on the same day, (2 January, 2018), the S&P/ASX200 accumulation index opened at 60,387.4. This was 40 per cent above its pre-GFC closing high and 184 per cent above its GFC closing low.

Figures from super fund researcher SuperRatings reinforce why investors should take a disciplined, long-term approach without being swayed by day-to-day movements in asset prices.

SuperRatings estimates that $100,000 invested in a median balanced super fund on November 1, 2007 – remember that is the day when the Australian market reached its pre-GFC closing high – would have increased to $163,218 by the beginning of 2018. Critically, the total doesn’t include contributions.




Written by Robin Bowerman, Head of Market Strategy and Communications at Vanguard.

Reproduced with permission of Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd

Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd (ABN 72 072 881 086 / AFS Licence 227263) is the product issuer. We have not taken yours and your clients’ circumstances into account when preparing this material so it may not be applicable to the particular situation you are considering. You should consider your circumstances and our Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Prospectus before making any investment decision. You can access our PDS or Prospectus online or by calling us. This material was prepared in good faith and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

© 2018 Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd. All rights reserved.

Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee take any responsibility for any action or any service provided by the author.

Any links have been provided with permission for information purposes only and will take you to external websites, which are not connected to our company in any way. Note: Our company does not endorse and is not responsible for the accuracy of the contents/information contained within the linked site(s) accessible from this page.

Power of retiree super dollars

With the waves of baby boomers now nearing or entering retirement, it is hardly surprising that the ranks of retired super members is rapidly growing. Yet the extent of that growth may surprise you.

The latest Superannuation Market Projections report, recently published by independent consultants Rice Warner, forecasts that the number of members with retirement accounts will rise by almost 70 per cent over the next 15 years to more than 3.7 million.

And the total value of retirement assets in super is expected to grow from $828.9 billion (as at June 2017) to $1.335 trillion in 2017 dollars over the same period.

However, the retirement segment of superannuation is not a story of straight-out growth. There are interesting dynamics occurring.

Rice Warner projects that retirement segment’s share of total superannuation assets will reduce from 35.6 per cent today to 31 per cent over the next 15 years.

This expected dip in market share is largely due the combination of retirees drawing down on their savings, and the growth in assets and members in the accumulation phase.

An even higher proportion of retirees in future are likely to take their super benefits as a pension rather than a lump sum – further breaking down the myth that Australia is a lump-sum society in regards to super.

“With the [superannuation] industry’s focus on member education, improved financial literacy of the general population, and retirement products aimed at helping members preserve retirement assets, we expect a decrease in the rate of lump sum benefits at retirement,” Rice Warner comments.

Over the next 15 years, the proportion of members taking their super as pensions rather than lump sums is expected to reach 90 per cent, “resulting in a positive cash flow in the long term” for super’s retirement sector.

It is anticipated that the biggest change will occur in the market share of the retirement dollars held by the different superannuation fund sectors.

Rice Warner forecasts that the market share of retirement assets held by the various fund sectors to significantly change over the next 15 years to: SMSFs, 44 per cent (58 per cent today); industry funds, 18.9 per cent (7.6 per cent today); commercial retirement products, 29.4 per cent (26.1 per cent today); public-sector funds, 7.8 per cent (7 per cent today); and corporate funds, nil per cent (1.3 per cent today).

The expected reduction in the proportion of retirement superannuation dollars held in self-managed super is readily understandable given that SMSFs hold by far the biggest market share of retiree super savings. SMSFs will therefore experience the largest proportion of retirement drawdowns.



Written by Robin Bowerman, Head of Market Strategy and Communications at Vanguard.
Reproduced with permission of Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd

Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd (ABN 72 072 881 086 / AFS Licence 227263) is the product issuer. We have not taken yours and your clients’ circumstances into account when preparing this material so it may not be applicable to the particular situation you are considering. You should consider your circumstances and our Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Prospectus before making any investment decision. You can access our PDS or Prospectus online or by calling us. This material was prepared in good faith and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

© 2018 Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd. All rights reserved.

Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee take any responsibility for any action or any service provided by the author.

Any links have been provided with permission for information purposes only and will take you to external websites, which are not connected to our company in any way. Note: Our company does not endorse and is not responsible for the accuracy of the contents/information contained within the linked site(s) accessible from this page.

Superannuation and moving overseas

If you’re an Australian permanent resident or citizen heading overseas, your super remains subject to the same rules, even if you are leaving Australia permanently. This means your super must remain in your super fund/s until you reach preservation age and are eligible to access it.

Can I contribute while I’m away?

Probably. However, there are restrictions on contributions to self-managed super funds (SMSFs).

People in other super funds often continue to make personal contributions to their Australian super fund while away to ensure their balance continues to grow and to cover any insurance premiums being deducted. In circumstances where you are working for an Australian employer internationally (see below) they may also be required to continue making Superannuation Guarantee payments into your account.

If you’re planning on heading overseas for an extended period of time it’s a good idea to do some research into funds which can offer a suitable choice of investments for your needs without charging excessive fees, while you’re away. This will help your balance grow even if you are no longer contributing.

Working overseas for an Australian employer

If your Australian employer sends you to work in another country, usually they will still be required to make Superannuation Guarantee payments into your super account. Australia has bilateral social security agreements with a number of countries that remove the issue of double superannuation coverage that might occur if you or your employer are required to make superannuation (or equivalent) contributions under the legislation of both countries for the same work. Visit the ATO website or call 13 10 20 for more information.

Temporary residents

If you are an overseas resident working temporarily in Australia, you may be eligible to be paid your superannuation money once you have left Australia through what is known as a departing Australia superannuation payment (DASP). For more information or to apply, visit the ATO website.


Reproduced with the permission of the The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Limited. This article was originally published at

This provides general information and hasn’t taken your circumstances into account. It’s important to consider your particular circumstances before deciding what’s right for you. Although the information is from sources considered reliable, we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. You should not rely upon it and should seek qualified advice before making any investment decision. Except where liability under any statute cannot be excluded, we do not accept any liability (whether under contract, tort or otherwise) for any resulting loss or damage of the reader or any other person. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future returns.

Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee take any responsibility for any action or any service provided by the author.



The financial difference for women

Recent decades have seen huge gains made in the financial empowerment of women. However complete financial equality won’t happen soon and in some cases may be unattainable. So what are the areas where women lag financially, and when it comes to retirement planning, what can be done?

4 key issues

  • Gender pay gap. Across all industries, including those in which female workers outnumber males, men are, on average, paid 18% more than women. For non-managerial clerical workers the gap is relatively small at 8.8%, but in key management positions women receive 26.6% less than their male peers. Large gaps also occur in the legal and medical professions.
  • Lower superannuation balances. While the pay gap is one reason why women have less in superannuation savings than men, another big contributor is time out of the workforce to raise children. Of 20 OECD countries, surprisingly Australia has the third lowest employment rate for mothers, particularly sole parents.
  • More expensive disability insurance. While pure life insurance is cheaper for women, income protection and disability insurance is more expensive. This is because women have longer life expectancies than men, but they make more claims, and for longer periods, on both temporary and permanent disability policies. For trauma insurance younger women pay more than men of the same age, and older women pay less than their male counterparts. Future advances in medicine may help to even out these differences.
  • Being single. Single women (and men) lose out on the financial economies of scale enjoyed by cohabiting couples. About 24% of Australians live in one-person households, and across all age groups, 55% of those living alone are women.

Focusing on super

While it will take significant social and political change to redress some of the financial imbalances between the sexes, there are things that women can do to improve their long-term financial position:

  • Understand the situation. If you are planning on taking time out of the workforce, what are the implications? As an example, 35-year-old professional Simone earns $120,000 per annum and has a super balance of $60,000. She plans on having three children and expects to be a full-time mum for seven years before returning to full-time work. As a result she may likely have around $77,450 (17%) less in super at retirement at age 67[1] than if she didn’t take time off.
  • Consider the options. Simone’s partner could plug some of this gap and potentially receive a tax benefit each year by making spouse contributions to her super fund while she is out of the workforce. This isn’t an option if Simone is (or becomes) single.

Another possibility is to increase contributions upon her return to work. If Simone salary sacrifices 2.9% of her pre-tax income to super, she could wipe out the estimated shortfall by the time she retires.

She could also consider changing her investment strategy or, less appealingly, delaying retirement.

Planning is the key

It certainly isn’t fair, but the reality is that more women, particularly single women, face greater financial hurdles than men. Planning for the range of scenarios is essential. To make sure you’re on the right track with insurance, superannuation and saving, talk to your licensed financial adviser.

For more information about planning for your future please contact us on 03 836 8399.

[1] Calculated using the Career Break Super Calculator available at using default settings.


This provides general information and hasn’t taken your circumstances into account. It’s important to consider your particular circumstances before deciding what’s right for you. Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee takes any responsibility for their action or any service they provide.

Monetary Policy Decision - Statement by Philip Lowe, RBA Governor, February 2018

At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 1.50 per cent.

There was a broad-based pick-up in the global economy in 2017. A number of advanced economies are growing at an above-trend rate and unemployment rates are low. Growth has also picked up in the Asian economies, partly supported by increased international trade. The Chinese economy continues to grow solidly, with the authorities paying increased attention to the risks in the financial sector and the sustainability of growth.

The pick-up in the global economy has contributed to a rise in oil and other commodity prices over recent months. Even so, Australia’s terms of trade are expected to decline over the next couple of years, but remain at a relatively high level.

Globally, inflation remains low, although higher commodity prices and tight labour markets are likely to see inflation increase over the next couple of years. Long-term bond yields have risen but are still low. As conditions have improved in the global economy, a number of central banks have withdrawn some monetary stimulus. Financial conditions remain expansionary, with credit spreads narrow.

The Bank’s central forecast for the Australian economy is for GDP growth to pick up, to average a bit above 3 per cent over the next couple of years. The data over the summer have been consistent with this outlook. Business conditions are positive and the outlook for non-mining business investment has improved. Increased public infrastructure investment is also supporting the economy. One continuing source of uncertainty is the outlook for household consumption. Household incomes are growing slowly and debt levels are high.

Employment grew strongly over 2017 and the unemployment rate declined. Employment has been rising in all states and has been accompanied by a significant rise in labour force participation. The various forward-looking indicators continue to point to solid growth in employment over the period ahead, with a further gradual reduction in the unemployment rate expected. Notwithstanding the improving labour market, wage growth remains low. This is likely to continue for a while yet, although the stronger economy should see some lift in wage growth over time. There are reports that some employers are finding it more difficult to hire workers with the necessary skills.

Inflation is low, with both CPI and underlying inflation running a little below 2 per cent. Inflation is likely to remain low for some time, reflecting low growth in labour costs and strong competition in retailing. A gradual pick-up in inflation is, however, expected as the economy strengthens. The central forecast is for CPI inflation to be a bit above 2 per cent in 2018.

On a trade-weighted basis, the Australian dollar remains within the range that it has been in over the past two years. An appreciating exchange rate would be expected to result in a slower pick-up in economic activity and inflation than currently forecast.

Nationwide measures of housing prices are little changed over the past six months, with prices having recorded falls in some areas. In the eastern capital cities, a considerable additional supply of apartments is scheduled to come on stream over the next couple of years. To address the medium-term risks associated with high and rising household indebtedness, APRA introduced a number of supervisory measures. Tighter credit standards have also been helpful in containing the build-up of risk in household balance sheets.

The low level of interest rates is continuing to support the Australian economy. Further progress in reducing unemployment and having inflation return to target is expected, although this progress is likely to be gradual. Taking account of the available information, the Board judged that holding the stance of monetary policy unchanged at this meeting would be consistent with sustainable growth in the economy and achieving the inflation target over time.


Source: Reserve Bank of Australia, February 6th, 2018


Media and Communications
Secretary’s Department
Reserve Bank of Australia

Phone: +61 2 9551 9720
Fax: +61 2 9551 8033

Ethical investing – putting your super where your heart is

Millennials – take a bow. Not only are you concerned about how your super is invested, you are more likely than other age group to act on your beliefs when choosing a super fund.

Research commissioned by the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) reveals that 75% of Millennials prefer to invest in a responsible super fund than one that only considers maximising financial returns. Well ahead of Gen X on 66% and Baby Boomers on 68%.

Across all demographics, the proportion of people who would rather invest in a super fund that “considers the environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues of the companies it invests in and maximises financial returns”, as opposed to a fund that focuses solely on maximising returns, has risen by 27% since 2013.

That’s a pretty strong trend which sends a clear message not only to superannuation and investment fund managers, but also to the wider corporate community – people care about more than just profits. They also want their investments to contribute to the greater good.

What makes an investment ethical?

Ethical investment funds may use positive screens to select companies that are doing ‘good’ things, or negative screens to exclude companies doing ‘bad things’. Or they may do a bit of both.

There are, of course, different views as to what is ‘ethical’. Someone with strong religious convictions may be interested in a very different range of investments than someone with deep environmental concerns. Typically, though, ethical funds tend to avoid investing in companies involved in weapons manufacture, alcohol, tobacco, gambling or fossil fuels while favouring renewable energy companies, sustainable technologies or healthcare.

Even then it can be difficult to decide if a particular company is ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Many people avoid investing in companies that mine uranium, but those same companies may also extract the materials needed to build wind turbine towers. Or a bank that finances coal mines may also lend to solar farms and energy efficiency projects.

Given the wide range of ethical considerations, you may need to do some in-depth research to find the fund or funds that best match your values.

Is your fund doing the right thing?

While you may have an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ attitude to your super, it’s important to remember it’s your money and you get to choose where and how it’s invested. Start with your fund’s website or disclosure documents and look for the environment, social and governance section.

Most large super funds offer a range of investment options, only some of which may match your idea of ‘ethical’. However, there may be a direct share option, allowing you to construct your own portfolio of shares in companies that are compatible with your values. Or you may look to the increasing number of investment managers that apply ethical filters across their entire range of funds.

Advice moves with the times

Fortunately it’s becoming easier to track down the investment funds that suit you.  Talk to us about the issues that are important to you so we can help you invest your super where your heart is. For more information about ethical investing please contact us on 03 9836 8399.


“From values to riches. Charting consumer attitudes and demand for responsible investing in Australia.” Responsible Investment Association Australasia


This provides general information and hasn’t taken your circumstances into account. It’s important to consider your particular circumstances before deciding what’s right for you. Any information provided by the author detailed above is separate and external to our business and our Licensee. Neither our business, nor our Licensee takes any responsibility for their action or any service they provide.